2018 Elections — Vital Decisions for Hungary’s Future


Zsuzsanna Szelényi

About Zsuzsanna Szelényi

Zsuzsanna Szelényi is a liberal Member of Parliament in Hungary. She covers foreign and security policy, migration, constitutional affairs and gender issues. She started her career as the founder of Fidesz, a youth party at the régime change in Hungary in 1988. She became a Member of Parliament of the first freely elected Parliament. She left politics in 1994 and had a professional career at the Council of Europe. In 2013 she returned to the Hungarian politics for the call of former Prime Minister Gordon Bajnai, who formed a new party, Together.

In 2010, when Viktor Orban took over Hungary’s government, he seemed like a typical mainstream-conservative European politician. But as soon as he announced his ‘voting booth revolution,’ we, who knew him, were aware that this would be the start of a new era in Hungary. Within a year, Orban’s one-party government rammed a new basic law through Parliament that tailored the constitution for his party’s interests. Indeed, his changes proved to be revolutionary. He established the first 21st-century populist state within the European Union.

Today, ten months before Hungary’s next parliamentary election, the multiparty opposition to Viktor Orban’s Fidesz party faces huge challenges. After the new election laws enabled Fidesz to keep its supermajority in 2014, Orban’s one-party power-building machine is even stronger now, and his state is openly repressive. The prime minister will do anything and everything to maintain his power. However, Hungarians have a deep feeling of ‘Orban fatigue’. While ruling Fidesz is still the most popular party, many believe that Orban’s dominion is bad for the country — but they see no viable alternative.

However, the opposition has learned a lot in four years. We understand what drove Orban’s success: the pervasive cynicism of the post-communist transition, which divided society into winners and losers; the general anxiety produced by the global financial crisis and Orban’s personal ruthlessness all enabled him to build exceptional power. In order to counter this openly Euro-sceptic, authoritarian and anti-pluralist force, the Hungarian opposition must mobilise the tired, fearful and apathetic voters.

Will the Hungarian opposition unify? In order to understand the challenges that the Hungarian opposition faces, we must consider the dire situation of Hungary’s current political landscape.

First of all, Hungary is no longer an open and liberal-democratic country. Since 2010, the liberal-democratic system has been severely distorted as Fidesz concentrated huge power in the ruling party. The existing institutions of checks and balances are all led by people with personal loyalty to the prime minister. Fidesz has centralised public media, municipalities and the entire public-service sector. It has changed party finances and election laws, and even controls much of the commercial media and the advertising market. The only remaining watchdogs in Hungarian society — independent media and NGOs — are systematically threatened. The government regularly organises hate-mongering campaigns, such as the referendum against migrants or the campaign against philanthropist George Soros. Fair elections are unimaginable in 2018.

Secondly, since 1990, Hungary has been a multiparty democracy with four to six parties represented in the parliament. The trap for today’s opposition is that Fidesz’s new election law forces challenger parties to create some kind of cooperation without being able to measure their political strength by popular vote. The impossibility of this situation was proven in the 2014 parliamentary election, when the liberal-green-socialist coalition not only lost to Fidesz — Orban’s party repeatedly secured a supermajority — but had its power diluted among seven opposition parties that gained seats in parliament. To change the status quo, we need more than reluctant cooperation among the opposition parties.

One of the opposition’s main challenges is to determine the actual problems that Hungarian citizens face, and which political parties need to respond to amid the changing European-Hungarian reality. It is far from obvious that the consequences of living in an illiberal state are perceived as the main problem. Unlike during communist times, nobody is being imprisoned for resisting authoritarian rule today. Since we belong to the European Union, few Hungarians believe that we live under a dictatorship. The real price that Hungary will pay for its illiberal leadership will only come later.

Hungary’s opposition parties also struggle to identify the main problems. Leftist parties believe that the most dramatic problem produced by Orban’s regime is the radical change in the redistribution system, which benefits only the upper-middle class while further impoverishing an outsized number of families. For them, inequality seems to be the key mobilising issue.

Other parties assume that globalisation is the main cause of our problems – a sentiment harnessed by the nationalist-opportunist government at the people’s expense. Still others believe that the most dangerous outcome of Orban’s authoritarianism is how it pushes Hungary back to Europe’s periphery. The only area of agreement is opposition to omnipresent corruption — but is that really an energising issue?

The opposition’s competing narratives embody a bitter competition for survival. While it is obvious that Orban’s party is everyone’s key opponent, a vicious rivalry consumes the opposition parties. In order to reach any kind of agreement, democratic parties must establish a power ranking. However, even if successful agreements are achieved among the liberal, green, and leftist parties, they must then address the formidable challenge of Hungary’s extreme-right Jobbik party.

Making the picture even more complex, the brand-new Order and Justice party recently emerged to the far right of Jobbik. Fidesz successfully positioned itself in the centre of Hungary’s political arena long ago, and it has a strong interest in staying there. Just as four years ago, we face the multiplication of political parties in the upcoming elections, encouraged by Fidesz’s new election law. A large-scale opposition coalition is almost impossible, so there is no reason to expect it to happen.

Still, negotiations will soon begin among eight opposition parties. In the absence of a respected and charismatic leader, the final cooperation will be based on ideologies, political culture, party size, and negotiation skills. Hungary’s election system – where people vote for a party candidate and a party list separately — offers some room for cooperation. Opposition parties will come to some sort of agreement. The parties are much more experienced than they were four years ago. They have learned a lot from their mistakes, and they now know the rules of “Orbanistan”.

However, the success of Hungary’s opposition will depend on whether they actually believe in victory, and whether they can clearly represent their beliefs to the people.

We, in the opposition, agree on one other thing — the high stakes for Hungary are clear. We know that 2018 will decide whether Hungary will once again anchor itself to the European mainstream and follow a new development path, or if the country will lose many years of liberty and progress, dropping behind while the rest of Europe moves ahead.


The views expressed in this opinion editorial are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Emerging Europe’s editorial policy.


Changing Perspectives and Showing That True Romania is a Vibrant Innovative Country

A Bosnian Referendum Shows Russia’s Influence in the Balkans—As Well As Its Limits

CEE — Do We Need a Launch Pad For Our On-Site Tech Intelligence in the Silicon Valley

The Long Tail of Global Expansion

Good Match But Unlikely Marriage

Examining How a Strong Swiss Franc Could Single-Handedly Topple Poland’s Economy

Poland’s Drift Away From Democracy

EU-CEE Is Still Growing at a Healthy Rate

Prague emerging europe

Polish Tax Laws — Fighting a Winning Battle Against Tax Evaders

Central and Eastern European Consumers Are Joining the Global Trends for Change

Czech Own Currency Insures Against Euro Losses

Euro Czech republic emerging europe

International Women’s Day — Let’s Take Action And Then Celebrate

Stuck in Neutral: Georgia’s Constitutional Reforms

Tbilisi Parliament Georgia

Fiscal Policy Predictability in CEE — It’s Time for Change

Finalising the DCFTA is Expected to Bring Multiple Benefits to Ukraine

China: A Giant That Is Hard to Crack

European Volatility Makes Economic Development Slower for Ukraine

EU Visa-Liberalisation Strengthens Georgia’s Pro-Western Path

georgia emerging europe eu

Falling into Old Ways in 2017? Ukraine’s Struggle for Functioning Economic Institutions

Adam Smith’s Warning for Poland

LGBT in CEE — A New Acceptance Is Being Born From Migration

Are There Differences Between How Tax Regulations in Poland and IAS Treat Intangible Assets?

Czech Republic Renaming Has Real Economic Costs

United or Divided? Europe in the Face of the Challenges of Tomorrow

The Morawiecki Plan Promises a Brighter Future for Poland

How Will Trump’s Visit Affect Polish Politics?

Donald trump

Poland: Is it Ready, and is it Time to Adopt the Euro?

Are Labour Shortages Driving Economic Growth?

How strong is V4?

Viktor Orban

The GREAT London Food Scene

Bakery in London

Resignation in Ukraine: War, Revolution, Crisis — Some Things Never Change

The EU’s Choice: Fundamental Reform Or Disintegration

Will a Two-speed European Union Side-line the Visegrad Four?

Romania Surviving the Waves of Recent Political Tsunamis in Europe

The Right to Water: Who Can Change Today’s Situation?

Big Fish, Small Fish, Where to Fish? On the Eve of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Let’s Stop Wasting Time Redefining our Place in Europe

Impact of Brexit on EU-CEE Not Overstated

theresa may brexit

Serbia’s New PM Is Cut From a Familiar Cloth

Serbian flag emerging europe

The Global Outsourcing Industry — the Rise of the Phoenix

Poland’s Unicorn, Slovakia’s Flying Car and the Future of Europe

Ukraine’s Reputation for Cheap Labour May Not Ring True in the Long-term

People Power Reminds the Government of the Rule of Law

Can Armenia Keep a Foot in Both Camps?

European union armenia russia emerging europe

Ex-Transition Economies’ FDI Recovery

dollar euro fdi

The Capital Markets Union: a New Beginning in the European Financial Sector?

The Sharing Economy Could Bring New Business Models to CEE

Business Moving Forward with Cautious Optimism — Can Investors Win the Confidence Game?

Could the West At Least Help Ukraine To Insure FDI Against Political Risks?

Where’s My Cheese? – The GREAT British Food Tour 2014

Cheese Shop

Old Fashioned Skulduggery Overshadows the Elections in Moldova

The Voice of European Business Must Be Heard Loud and Clear by Brexit Negotiators

Bulgaria Needs a Reform-Oriented Government to Take Full Advantage of its EU Membership

bulgaria emerging europe

Not All Quiet on the Eastern Front

The Netherlands’ Objection to the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement could be Costly to Europe

PiS Uses Media Control to Bring Poland to Heel

Jaroslaw kaczynski pis emerging europe

Azerbaijan: The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Nothing


Brexit: Let’s Learn the Lesson and Hope a Better Europe Will Arise

Will the New Five-day Visa-free Regime Encourage More Visitors to Belarus?

January Kicks Off an Exciting Year for Emerging Europe

Albania’s Election Apathy

tirana albania

A Positive and Modern View of Entrepreneurship

Poland’s Confusing GDP Growth

Macedonia’s Controversial Coalition Government

SKOPJE MACEDONIA emerging europe

Measuring Growth of Societies with GDP Alone Shows an Incomplete Picture

How Will Poland Approach the Brexit Negotiations?

Belarus 2020: Turning the Vicious Circle Into an Upward Spiral

Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Moves from Frozen to Kinetic


Poland Needs to Cling to the Eurozone

zloty euro emerging europe

History as Destiny? Institutional Erosion in Ukraine and Poland

The CEE Region Is Making Advances in Prioritising Waste-to-Energy Projects

Europe at Odds over OPAL and Nord Stream 2

Hungary’s Nationalist Assault on Free Enquiry

victor orban ceu

The Competitive Edge in Central and Eastern Europe

SOFIA BULGARIA - MAY 5: View of the Ivan Vazov National Theatre in Sofia on May 5 2016. Sofia is the largest city and capital of Bulgaria.

A New Division Between Eastern And Western Europe?

Prepare for a New Europe

Global Expansion in the Digital Age

Breaking With Imitations of the Past

Europe Needs To Be More Proactive In Embracing Armenia

Poland’s Capital Saturation Lower Than the Czech Republic’s

deloitte fdi poland

Outsourcing in Germany: Stop Talking at and Start Talking to

After 25 Years of Restructuring, the Romanian Power Sector Is at a Crossroad

We, the Post-Communist Generation, Have the Skills to Rid of the Past And Create Our Own Future

Moldova Falls Victim to Politicising

moldova emerging europe

The EU’s Benign Neglect Of Eastern Europe

  1. So many lies in one article, one does not even know where to begin!

    Orban has no real opponent aside from Jobbik, because the left managed to completely discredit itself in the 2002-2010 period. Hungary’s debt/GDP ratio increased from 56% to 83% during those years. The consumer FX debt bubble was also allowed to form in that period. Hungary was forced to be the first EU country to take an IMF loan as a result. The consequences of the economic mess that the left, left behind it were felt beyond 2010. By 2011, Hungary fell far behind its peers in wages, birth rates, employment and so on. Orban can be credited for stabilizing Hungary and reversing some of the damage you guy caused to Hungary. Debt/GDP ratio is now down to 74%, employment is higher than it was at any point in the past two decades, the FX debt issue is fixed and net average wages have caught up with those in Slovakia, being only 30-40 Euros apart, so kind of hard to argue that it only benefits the rich. And the left is trying to convince Hungarian voters that all of this is bad, so they should vote for them again? Good luck! If you want to win, you have to acknowledge the positive improvements and then promise to build on top of the improvements, by presenting ways to safeguard the improvements and showing policies which could further the gains..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *