Can Armenia Keep a Foot in Both Camps?

.

Michael Hindley

About Michael Hindley

Michael Hindley is an adviser on trade relations to the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), including reports on EU/Central Asia relations. Earlier, he was vice-president of the European Parliament’s Trade Committee and an Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) election monitor in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine. He is a frequent lecturer on EU External Relations including at Economics University of Varna Babes Bolyai University in Cluj; Higher Schools of Economics Perm and Moscow, Russia; Academy of Economic Science in Chisinau and Taras Shevchenko University in Kyiv.

Geography and history are political tyrants and nowhere more so than for in Armenia. For all the emphasis, nowadays, on the potential of regional trade, Armenia is boxed into a situation that offers little or no openings. History, distant and none too distant, rules our alliances with Turkey or Azerbaijan and Russia’s brutal show of force in Georgia, in 2008, casts a sombre shadow on Tbilisi’s room for manoeuvre.

The collapse of the Soviet Union raised the profile of its European nemesis, the European Union (EU). The liberated Baltic States found sanctuary and hope in membership of the EU as did Soviet satellites such as Poland and Hungary. Putin has since stabilised Russia, though we may disapprove of his methods, and this has prevented any other former Soviet Union states following the Baltics. The EU’s ham-fisted and naive attempts to draw the whole of the Ukraine into its orbit have proven catastrophic, leaving other aspiring candidates for EU membership apprehensive.

With no contingent border with any EU state, Armenia has observed this still-unravelling drama with a mixture of optimism, pessimism and above all resigned realism.

Looking westwards from Armenia has been useful, practically, but of limited practicability. The countries of Central and Eastern Europe, formerly in the Soviet sphere, have had a rocky road of integration with the EU. The earliest pilgrims, the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary set the pattern when their political elite used the incentive of membership of the EU to push through domestic economic reforms. The cold shower therapy brought immediate collapses but was mitigated by the promise of the warmer waters of the EU market. Subsequent disillusionment has led to the rise of nationalist populism in Poland and Hungary.

Armenia realised early enough that “membership” was some distant grail and better kept as such, membership — given geography alone — simply wasn’t and isn’t on any immediate agenda. But, and here the Armenian elite have been canny, using the EU’s templates for economic reform have proved extremely useful in reforming parts of the Armenian economy, particularly in areas such as food safety and the potential reform of state aid legislation. This certainly helps Armenia’s export potential to the EU, the country’s largest market.

Armenia’s autocratic governments have no difficulty ramming through reforms with little fear of effective opposition. Going further and deepening relations with the EU, as was once seen as possible and is certainly logical, towards a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the EU, would have obvious benefits. However, and it is a very large however, the EU offers no safety net as the pro-EU factions in Ukraine have found to their bitter cost. As an economic model, Russia has little attraction for Armenia, but in a convoluted way Russia does offer security, in the sense of offering not to become a threat.

This is the background to Armenia’s volte-face when it joined the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) in 2014, under Russian duress. The attractions of the Belarus, Kyrgyz and Kazakh markets are scarcely tempting and certainly not in comparison to the EU. However, offending Russia in order to further a dream, rather than a promise, from the EU simply wasn’t worth the risk.

The question now is can Armenia keep a foot in both camps? Certainly the EU has deep reservations, because membership of the EEU is incompatible with membership of the EU and probably incompatible with any enhanced trading relations with the EU which Armenia had wanted, prior to 2014.

With its unfortunate experience of over-enthusiasm towards Ukraine, the EU has retrenched and decided that, for the time being, a “Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement” with Armenia is enough to keep things warming on the back-burner.

The EU is popular in Armenia and the Armenian elite, who benefit from technical and law framing guidance and financial aid from the EU. Armenia also wishes to expand its exports to the world largest single market and needs technical aid to meet EU market regulations.

Both the EU and Armenia realise that “membership” offers can indeed be counter-productive. In Hungary and Poland, the previous reformist governments have got too far ahead of the population and have provoked populist backlashes. On the other hand, for Armenia the EEU is a realistic, though limited, scenario. In the unlikely event of the EEU being economically successful, then Armenia gains; and anyway joining keeps Russia happy.

A revived EU/Armenia Agreement has been initialled at ministerial level, but needs approval. This is no problem in authoritarian Armenia, where the political process has been compliant to the demands of its elite, even when it involves a volte face on the EEU in 2014.

On the EU side, the deal has to be ratified by the Strasbourg Parliament, which can be a tricky matter. Justified concerns will be expressed about human and democratic rights in Armenia and there will be a vocal anti-Putin caucus that is distrustful of the EEU. But for how long Armenia’s tightrope walk of external trade and internal economic reform à la Berlaymont (EU HQ) and external security à la Kremlin lasts, remains to be seen. Certainly luck and good judgement will be needed in great measure.

_______________

The views expressed in this opinion editorial are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Emerging Europe’s editorial policy.

RELATED ARTICLES

The Capital Markets Union: a New Beginning in the European Financial Sector?

Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Moves from Frozen to Kinetic

Nagorno-Karabakh

A New Division Between Eastern And Western Europe?

A Bosnian Referendum Shows Russia’s Influence in the Balkans—As Well As Its Limits

Examining How a Strong Swiss Franc Could Single-Handedly Topple Poland’s Economy

The GREAT London Food Scene

Bakery in London

Poland’s Confusing GDP Growth

Political Tensions Rise As Croatia Allegedly Breaks the Dublin III Refugee Regulation

croatia migrants

European Volatility Makes Economic Development Slower for Ukraine

Swimpassing Dniester Without Prejudice To Democracy

Parliament of the republic of moldova in chisinau, national flag, stefan cel mare street, spring time with blue sky

Macedonia’s Controversial Coalition Government

SKOPJE MACEDONIA emerging europe

Polish Tax Laws — Fighting a Winning Battle Against Tax Evaders

Romania Surviving the Waves of Recent Political Tsunamis in Europe

The EU’s Choice: Fundamental Reform Or Disintegration

Hungary’s Nationalist Assault on Free Enquiry

victor orban ceu

E-lifestyle and Cyber Security: Some Views From Estonia

Cyber Security Protection Firewall Interface Concept

Where’s My Cheese? – The GREAT British Food Tour 2014

Cheese Shop

The Long Tail of Global Expansion

Azerbaijan: The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Nothing

Baku

Big Fish, Small Fish, Where to Fish? On the Eve of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

January Kicks Off an Exciting Year for Emerging Europe

Czech Republic Renaming Has Real Economic Costs

Czech Own Currency Insures Against Euro Losses

Euro Czech republic emerging europe

EU-CEE Is Still Growing at a Healthy Rate

Prague emerging europe

Poland: Is it Ready, and is it Time to Adopt the Euro?

Prepare for a New Europe

CEE — Do We Need a Launch Pad For Our On-Site Tech Intelligence in the Silicon Valley

Is there any prospect of ‘Polexit’?

poland european union polexit

Emphasising the Incongruence Between the V4 Countries

Macron emerging europe

Global Expansion in the Digital Age

Poland’s Unicorn, Slovakia’s Flying Car and the Future of Europe

Hungary and Israel: the Collision of Past and Present

Budapest synagoge

Serbia’s New PM Is Cut From a Familiar Cloth

Serbian flag emerging europe

The Voice of European Business Must Be Heard Loud and Clear by Brexit Negotiators

Ukraine’s Reputation for Cheap Labour May Not Ring True in the Long-term

Why Hungary’s New NGO Law Is Harmful for Business

Budapest, Hungary. Aerial view of the old city Budapest, Hungary with river and Parliament Building with cloudy blue sky

The Sharing Economy Could Bring New Business Models to CEE

PiS Uses Media Control to Bring Poland to Heel

Jaroslaw kaczynski pis emerging europe

Good Match But Unlikely Marriage

The Netherlands’ Objection to the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement could be Costly to Europe

Let’s Stop Wasting Time Redefining our Place in Europe

Finalising the DCFTA is Expected to Bring Multiple Benefits to Ukraine

CEE-Benefits and Disadvantages of Joining the Eurozone

forint zloty euro

Changing Perspectives and Showing That True Romania is a Vibrant Innovative Country

We, the Post-Communist Generation, Have the Skills to Rid of the Past And Create Our Own Future

Ex-Transition Economies’ FDI Recovery

dollar euro fdi

The EU’s Benign Neglect Of Eastern Europe

The Global Outsourcing Industry — the Rise of the Phoenix

Albania’s Election Apathy

tirana albania

Stuck in Neutral: Georgia’s Constitutional Reforms

Tbilisi Parliament Georgia

How Will Trump’s Visit Affect Polish Politics?

Donald trump

Impact of Brexit on EU-CEE Not Overstated

theresa may brexit

Defending EU Values in Poland and Hungary

Eu hungary poland

Adam Smith’s Warning for Poland

Are There Differences Between How Tax Regulations in Poland and IAS Treat Intangible Assets?

People Power Reminds the Government of the Rule of Law

The Competitive Edge in Central and Eastern Europe

SOFIA BULGARIA - MAY 5: View of the Ivan Vazov National Theatre in Sofia on May 5 2016. Sofia is the largest city and capital of Bulgaria.

Belarus 2020: Turning the Vicious Circle Into an Upward Spiral

History as Destiny? Institutional Erosion in Ukraine and Poland

Breaking With Imitations of the Past

United or Divided? Europe in the Face of the Challenges of Tomorrow

After Its Significant Rise the Georgian Economy May Now Fall

Panorama of Tbilisi, Georgia in sunset rays. Vivid, saturated, splittoned image.

Measuring Growth of Societies with GDP Alone Shows an Incomplete Picture

Fiscal Policy Predictability in CEE — It’s Time for Change

Old Fashioned Skulduggery Overshadows the Elections in Moldova

How Will Poland Approach the Brexit Negotiations?

Business Moving Forward with Cautious Optimism — Can Investors Win the Confidence Game?

LGBT in CEE — A New Acceptance Is Being Born From Migration

EU Visa-Liberalisation Strengthens Georgia’s Pro-Western Path

georgia emerging europe eu

Outsourcing in Germany: Stop Talking at and Start Talking to

The Morawiecki Plan Promises a Brighter Future for Poland

Will a Two-speed European Union Side-line the Visegrad Four?

Moldova Falls Victim to Politicising

moldova emerging europe

When Neutrality Isn’t an Option

President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin

After 25 Years of Restructuring, the Romanian Power Sector Is at a Crossroad

Poland’s Drift Away From Democracy

Are Labour Shortages Driving Economic Growth?

Resignation in Ukraine: War, Revolution, Crisis — Some Things Never Change

Poland’s Capital Saturation Lower Than the Czech Republic’s

deloitte fdi poland

International Women’s Day — Let’s Take Action And Then Celebrate

2018 Elections — Vital Decisions for Hungary’s Future

Victor Orban energing europe

The Right to Water: Who Can Change Today’s Situation?

China: A Giant That Is Hard to Crack

Central and Eastern European Consumers Are Joining the Global Trends for Change

Europe at Odds over OPAL and Nord Stream 2

Could the West At Least Help Ukraine To Insure FDI Against Political Risks?

How strong is V4?

Viktor Orban

Bulgaria Needs a Reform-Oriented Government to Take Full Advantage of its EU Membership

bulgaria emerging europe

Partnership is the Key to CEE-Indian Business

Europe Needs To Be More Proactive In Embracing Armenia

A Positive and Modern View of Entrepreneurship

Not All Quiet on the Eastern Front

Will the New Five-day Visa-free Regime Encourage More Visitors to Belarus?

Poland Needs to Cling to the Eurozone

zloty euro emerging europe

Falling into Old Ways in 2017? Ukraine’s Struggle for Functioning Economic Institutions

The CEE Region Is Making Advances in Prioritising Waste-to-Energy Projects

Brexit: Let’s Learn the Lesson and Hope a Better Europe Will Arise

  1. “Our allies Turkey and Azerbaijan”…….. and “Autocratic and authoritarian Armenia”…….. Snowflake politics based on a neocon template is so amusing. In taking the above two Genocidal and Islamist dictatorships into consideration this author’s silly psychobabble can be translated as: ‘let’s avoid the elephant in the room and talk about why the window is slightly crooked’. What’s especially disturbing is that the author was supposedly an “election monitor in Azerbaijan”… lol. So what did you learn when you observed the tin-pot dictator of Azerbaijan get “democratically elected” with 95% votes and next “democratically” appointed his plastic-faced wife as “vice president”… anything? Or is that the twin elephant you’d like to conveniently avoid?

    1. Please read carefully, I didn’t say Azer & Turk were Armenia’s allies, on the contrary I said history rules out Azer and Turk being allies for Armenia. Perhaps in your anger and haste you read what you wanted to see and not what I wrote. Apology isn’t needed but would be appreciated

      Michael Hindley

      1. Michael,

        I think you’re guilty of exactly what you say he is, not reading. He never said that Armenia and the Turkish countries were allies. I believe he was implying “our” in this case was the United States.

        Your statement was “History … rules our alliances with Turkey or Azerbaijan”. The use of “our” in this sentence is a poor choice, because who are you actually talking about? United States? Germany?

        If it’s United States, in fact, this is really incorrect. It’s more like geography more than history. Unless you are talking about the historical antipathy of Russia and the Ottoman Empire.

        In reality, we were on opposite sides in WW I, and the Turkish massacre of Armenians was condemned by the United States. So, no, not history. Pragmatism? Yes. Geography? Yes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend? Yes.

        Referring to Europe in a historical context is more flawed, since it has not acted in unison. So, going back to WW I, you could say Germany was an ally, but before that, Prussia had essentially nothing to do with the Ottomans.

        France and Britain fought against Russia, with the Turks, in the Crimean War, but that was more to oppose expansion of Russian power. Of course, they fought them in WW I, so that would more than invalidate that premise.

        I think you’d be more accurate to say geography than history. They are very important geographically to oppose the Russians and act within the middle-east, although given their current state, they aren’t a particularly good ally. But that may change with a new regime.

  2. Funnily enough, Azerbaijan is also about to sign a SPA with EU….. EU who praised the last elections in Armenia as being within the international standards. No wonder then why EU voice is becoming increasingly inaudible, victim of its own double standards. Sadly, ideologically weak and populist opposition in Armenia not only affect the country’s development but also the way it is perceived outside. Double punishment here for Armenians citizens, who cannot be blamed for they realistic electoral choice given the lack of credible alternative.
    Finally, if EU is able to take proper conclusions the after the Ukrainian fiasco, Armenia may well serve as an example of new partnership frame with Eastern Europe, a bridge integrated within EEU but applying reforms supported by EU, and while EU membership is completely unrealistic (firstly because of the EU itself), a bilateral FTA may well be possible depending again mostly on EU flexibility and will to support Armenia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *