Political Tensions Rise As Croatia Allegedly Breaks the Dublin III Refugee Regulation

.

Drago Župarić-Iljić

About Drago Župarić-Iljić

Dr Drago Župarić-Iljić is a sociologist, working as a research associate at the Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies in Zagreb. His research within the interdisciplinary fields of forced migration, asylum, ethnicity and environmental studies focuses on various structural causes and drivers of migration, mobility and post-migration phenomena, with a special concern on the CEE region. He edited the volume on a topic of development of asylum protection systems in Croatia and the West Balkan.

In late July 2017, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that Croatia had broken the Dublin III Regulation during mass-arrivals of refugees and forced migrants in 2015/2016. The rule was supposedly broken by allowing the refugees to cross over Croatian territory. This lead to the refugees ‘irregularly’ travelling further to Slovenia and Austria without imposing legal mechanisms of interception and eventual examinations of the possible claims for international protection (asylum).

However, the Court’s decision has a certain time constraint, limiting the responsibility of ‘the first EU entry-point state’ up to twelve months from the date of the unlawful irregular migrant’s border. Therefore, it is only possible to forcibly return those irregular migrants who might have later become protection seekers whose request for return was filed by the member state within that period crossing. There is the exception, however, of returning them to Greece from 2011 onwards.

We still cannot perceive what implications this decision will have in domain of national and regional politics, if any. The question is could this decision result in diplomatic and political tensions over the issue of higher numbers of forced returns of asylum seekers from the other EU member states to Croatia, like the practice which is now, by this Court’s decision, overtly legitimised.

Retrospectively, this puzzle was set in summer of 2015 by Angela Merkel’s call for more solidarity and humane solutions for the growing displacement movements of Syrian refugees. It is known that Germany welcomed politics of open doors, which meant temporarily suspending  the Dublin system. This enabled the situation of semi-legalised mass-arrivals and transfers of people from war-torn areas of Middle East over the Balkans to the core EU countries.

At that time, the Croatian government initially took a humanitarian stance by employing a strategy of state-controlled, organised, fast transit of people, adjusted and coordinated together with Serbian and Slovenian governments. More than 660,000 trespassed the country, while only some two hundred of them decided to lodge their claims for asylum in Croatia, before the gradual closure of the Balkan corridor in March 2016.

After the EU-Turkey agreement, further security measures, militarisation and criminalisation of the borders, plus asylum and mobility issues took place. Protecting the EU borders once again became more important than enabling refugees the access to territory and to status determination procedure.

In 2016, Austria sent more than two thousand claims for returns via Dublin to the Croatian Ministry of Interior. In 2016 and the first half of 2017, Croatia has accepted around eight hundred people, more than half of which are from Austria, Switzerland, Germany and other Western European countries. Most of the forced returnees were Afghani, Syrian and Iraqi nationals.

Being one of the EU ‘non-Schengen’ countries with very low protection recognition rates (around three hundred granted out of eight thousand applicants since 2004), less integration prospects and a lack of immigrants networks, Croatia still seems not to be attractive for refugees.. Many refugees are accommodated in two reception centres hosting a maximum of seven hundred people.

Supplementary integration activities are undertaken by few humanitarian and faith-based organisations. Even though those granted with protection could rely on state-paid apartments for two years and welfare benefits, the main problems remain to be the non-existence of systemic state-executed integration assistance. That being, most notably, the lack of language learning courses and employment opportunities. Moreover, recent public opinion polls indicate that former ‘Eastern bloc’ and Balkan countries are among the least-welcoming receptive countries for migrants.

Due to these circumstances, the majority of asylum seekers, as well as many asylum grantees, after a few months of staying in Croatia still opt for a chance to move further West. Croatia also accepted a quota of 1,640 people who would eventually be transferred over relocation and resettlement mechanisms. However, less than a hundred of them are relocated from Italy and Greece, proving that EU responsibility sharing and solidarity mechanisms are largely ineffective.

In this setting, the preconditions for forcible returns of rejected asylum seekers and their actual stay in Croatia are by far disputable. Besides, some civil society and refugee-rights organisations reported on violent interceptions, push-backs and expulsions of migrants at the Croatian-Serbian border, arguing that violations of human rights are regularly taking place after the closing of the Balkan corridor. Civil actors also warned about the sudden increase in negative decisions on asylum applications in Croatia. In the period from January to July 2017, there were many examples of refusals of applications for international protection, because applicants were classified as ‘security obstacles’ to Croatian state and/or society.

Decisions on a so-called ‘security obstacle’ are done by arbitrary assessments of the national Security and Intelligence Agency, which then serve as a legal ground to the Ministry of Interior’s rejections of applicants. It remains vague as to why all of those classified as security threats are some sixty persons who have been returned to Croatia since September 2016 via Dublin, and have since applied for international protection. Among them, there are children, disabled persons and single mothers.

Thus, humanitarian actors were advocating lawful and transparent treatment of asylum seekers, stressing this practice has led to a series of irregularities and arbitrariness resulting in violations of human and refugee rights. Most of the rejected applicants have submitted an administrative complaint to the Administrative Court, challenging these classified, secretive and arbitrary, undisclosed decisions.

Long periods of uncertainty and waiting followed by rejections could impact the applicants’ mental health and well-being, resulting in serious psycho-social problems related to existential stress and trauma. After living abroad in different administrative limbos and in various integration systems, they hope for the betterment of their legal statuses and life prospects.

Unfortunately, in the aforementioned decision, the Court missed the opportunity to dwell on the inadequacy of the Dublin system and the burden which it puts on states at the EU and Schengen external borders in regards to reception and protection prospects. Neither had it followed the argument of Advocate General Sharpston, which emphasised how the responsibility for applications and enabling the international protection should be taken and determined by those countries where the asylum seekers lodged their applications. In brief, the legal mechanisms of the EU have not been designed to cover such exceptional situations as the mass-arrivals of refugees and the probable humanitarian crises that could unfold.

However, the ‘Temporary Protection Directive’ that might had applied here was never called upon. Nowadays, refugees themselves, as well as countries on the edge of the EU asylum, border and migration system such as Croatia, have to pay a debt to these ineffective, non-solidary and unfair policies. They do so by balancing between personal agencies of how to move on or (not to) move back, versus national strategies on how to stay the least attractive to refugees. In addition, the demanding policies from ‘the EU core’ on how to prevent further ‘asylum shopping’ and/or ‘asylum orbiting’ cases is also causing problems.

_______________

The views expressed in this opinion editorial are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Emerging Europe’s editorial policy.

RELATED ARTICLES

Fiscal Policy Predictability in CEE — It’s Time for Change

Not All Quiet on the Eastern Front

Why Was Zapad-2017 So Important?

russian tank belarus zapad

Poland’s Capital Saturation Lower Than the Czech Republic’s

deloitte fdi poland

Poland’s Drift Away From Democracy

Europe at Odds over OPAL and Nord Stream 2

Prepare for a New Europe

Czech Own Currency Insures Against Euro Losses

Euro Czech republic emerging europe

The Sharing Economy Could Bring New Business Models to CEE

CEE-Benefits and Disadvantages of Joining the Eurozone

forint zloty euro

Will the New Five-day Visa-free Regime Encourage More Visitors to Belarus?

Belarus 2020: Turning the Vicious Circle Into an Upward Spiral

Why Hungary’s New NGO Law Is Harmful for Business

Budapest, Hungary. Aerial view of the old city Budapest, Hungary with river and Parliament Building with cloudy blue sky

Could the West At Least Help Ukraine To Insure FDI Against Political Risks?

The Competitive Edge in Central and Eastern Europe

SOFIA BULGARIA - MAY 5: View of the Ivan Vazov National Theatre in Sofia on May 5 2016. Sofia is the largest city and capital of Bulgaria.

January Kicks Off an Exciting Year for Emerging Europe

Ukraine’s Economic Recovery: Good, But Slow

ukraine money

A Positive and Modern View of Entrepreneurship

Changing Perspectives and Showing That True Romania is a Vibrant Innovative Country

E-lifestyle and Cyber Security: Some Views From Estonia

Cyber Security Protection Firewall Interface Concept

Will a Two-speed European Union Side-line the Visegrad Four?

Azerbaijan: The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Nothing

Baku

Where’s My Cheese? – The GREAT British Food Tour 2014

Cheese Shop

Brexit: Let’s Learn the Lesson and Hope a Better Europe Will Arise

Impact of Brexit on EU-CEE Not Overstated

theresa may brexit

2018 Elections — Vital Decisions for Hungary’s Future

Victor Orban energing europe

How Will Poland Approach the Brexit Negotiations?

Europe Needs To Be More Proactive In Embracing Armenia

Swimpassing Dniester Without Prejudice To Democracy

Parliament of the republic of moldova in chisinau, national flag, stefan cel mare street, spring time with blue sky

Are There Differences Between How Tax Regulations in Poland and IAS Treat Intangible Assets?

Is there any prospect of ‘Polexit’?

poland european union polexit

The Netherlands’ Objection to the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement could be Costly to Europe

Examining How a Strong Swiss Franc Could Single-Handedly Topple Poland’s Economy

Old Fashioned Skulduggery Overshadows the Elections in Moldova

Poland’s Unicorn, Slovakia’s Flying Car and the Future of Europe

Serbia’s New PM Is Cut From a Familiar Cloth

Serbian flag emerging europe

EU Visa-Liberalisation Strengthens Georgia’s Pro-Western Path

georgia emerging europe eu

After 25 Years of Restructuring, the Romanian Power Sector Is at a Crossroad

Romania Surviving the Waves of Recent Political Tsunamis in Europe

Why is Armenia Borrowing Another 100 Million US Dollars From Russia?

International Women’s Day — Let’s Take Action And Then Celebrate

A Bosnian Referendum Shows Russia’s Influence in the Balkans—As Well As Its Limits

Is the CEE Region About to Steal the Outsourcing Crown From India?

Amazing view on the Taj Mahal in sunset light with reflection in water. The Taj Mahal is an ivory-white marble mausoleum on the south bank of the Yamuna river. Agra Uttar Pradesh India.

The Voice of European Business Must Be Heard Loud and Clear by Brexit Negotiators

The EU’s Choice: Fundamental Reform Or Disintegration

Poland Challenges the European Identity

Poland emerging europe

The EU’s Benign Neglect Of Eastern Europe

Regional Relations in the Western Balkans: Moving Beyond Folklore

Bosnia and Herzegovina flag with Serbia flag, 3D rendering

Falling into Old Ways in 2017? Ukraine’s Struggle for Functioning Economic Institutions

European Volatility Makes Economic Development Slower for Ukraine

Slovenia’s Presidential Election: Pahor Expected to Romp Home

Slovenia flag against blue sky waving in wind

Euroscepticism in Serbia: An Image Problem?

EU-CEE Is Still Growing at a Healthy Rate

Prague emerging europe

The Global Outsourcing Industry — the Rise of the Phoenix

We, the Post-Communist Generation, Have the Skills to Rid of the Past And Create Our Own Future

Global Expansion in the Digital Age

Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Moves from Frozen to Kinetic

Nagorno-Karabakh

Macedonia’s Controversial Coalition Government

SKOPJE MACEDONIA emerging europe

Belarusian Journalists Still Face Huge Problems

Can Armenia Keep a Foot in Both Camps?

European union armenia russia emerging europe

The Morawiecki Plan Promises a Brighter Future for Poland

Emphasising the Incongruence Between the V4 Countries

Macron emerging europe

Ukraine’s Reputation for Cheap Labour May Not Ring True in the Long-term

The GREAT London Food Scene

Bakery in London

Defending EU Values in Poland and Hungary

Eu hungary poland

Big Fish, Small Fish, Where to Fish? On the Eve of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Emerging Europe Back on Track to Convergence

wiiw

Polish Tax Laws — Fighting a Winning Battle Against Tax Evaders

Stuck in Neutral: Georgia’s Constitutional Reforms

Tbilisi Parliament Georgia

Are Czech-EU Relations at Breaking Point?

PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC - 21 JUNE 2014: People on the streets of Prague, Czech Republic. Prague is one of the most visited city in Europe with over 5 million visitors every year.

Outsourcing in Germany: Stop Talking at and Start Talking to

How strong is V4?

Viktor Orban

After Its Significant Rise the Georgian Economy May Now Fall

Panorama of Tbilisi, Georgia in sunset rays. Vivid, saturated, splittoned image.

People Power Reminds the Government of the Rule of Law

The CEE Region Is Making Advances in Prioritising Waste-to-Energy Projects

Moldova’s Briefly Suspended President is Still in Business

chisinau moldova parliament

Under Promise, Over Deliver: Prospects for the EU’s Eastern Partnership in 2018

Eastern partnership

The Right to Water: Who Can Change Today’s Situation?

Hungary and Israel: the Collision of Past and Present

Budapest synagoge

Breaking With Imitations of the Past

Central and Eastern European Consumers Are Joining the Global Trends for Change

When Neutrality Isn’t an Option

President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin

Poland’s Confusing GDP Growth

Poland: Is it Ready, and is it Time to Adopt the Euro?

LGBT in CEE — A New Acceptance Is Being Born From Migration

CEE — Do We Need a Launch Pad For Our On-Site Tech Intelligence in the Silicon Valley

The Capital Markets Union: a New Beginning in the European Financial Sector?

Poland Needs to Cling to the Eurozone

zloty euro emerging europe

Resignation in Ukraine: War, Revolution, Crisis — Some Things Never Change

Czech Republic Renaming Has Real Economic Costs

How Will Trump’s Visit Affect Polish Politics?

Donald trump

A New Division Between Eastern And Western Europe?

Bulgaria Needs a Reform-Oriented Government to Take Full Advantage of its EU Membership

bulgaria emerging europe

Are Labour Shortages Driving Economic Growth?

History as Destiny? Institutional Erosion in Ukraine and Poland

Hungary’s Nationalist Assault on Free Enquiry

victor orban ceu

Ex-Transition Economies’ FDI Recovery

dollar euro fdi

Business Moving Forward with Cautious Optimism — Can Investors Win the Confidence Game?

China: A Giant That Is Hard to Crack

Finalising the DCFTA is Expected to Bring Multiple Benefits to Ukraine

The Long Tail of Global Expansion

Only a United Opposition Can Defeat Poland’s Ruling Law and Justice Party

Classical building of Polish parliament. Warsaw in Poland.

Moldova Falls Victim to Politicising

moldova emerging europe

Is the Level of Foreign Ownership a Problem in Emerging Europe?

Flags of European countries flying from their capital cities. Viewed from the South.

‘Traditional Values’: A Potent Weapon Against LGBT Rights

gay rights putin

Will Poland Leave the European Union?

polexit

Partnership is the Key to CEE-Indian Business

United or Divided? Europe in the Face of the Challenges of Tomorrow

Good Match But Unlikely Marriage

Albania’s Election Apathy

tirana albania

Let’s Stop Wasting Time Redefining our Place in Europe

PiS Uses Media Control to Bring Poland to Heel

Jaroslaw kaczynski pis emerging europe

Measuring Growth of Societies with GDP Alone Shows an Incomplete Picture

Adam Smith’s Warning for Poland

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *