Poland Challenges the European Identity

.

George Friedman

About George Friedman

Dr George Friedman is a geopolitical forecaster and strategist on international affairs. He is the founder and chairman of Geopolitical Futures, a new online publication that analyses and forecasts the course of global events. Prior to founding Geopolitical Futures, he was chairman of Stratfor, the private intelligence publishing and consulting firm he founded in 1996. He received a BA at the City College of New York, where he majored in political science, and a PhD in government at Cornell University.

I am writing this from a hotel room in Warsaw, surrounded by memorials to Frederic Chopin, the great Polish composer and champion of self-determination for the Polish people. This is a particularly appropriate time to be here, since Poland is locked in a battle with the European Union over the question of Polish national self-determination — more than two centuries after Chopin was born.

The issue comes down to this: Poland elected a government that pledged to change the direction in which the country was moving. The new government was of the right. It opposed the policies and institutional stance of the previous, left-of-centre government. The previous government had embedded its followers in various institutions, such as the courts and national radio, as governments tend to do. The new government saw itself as facing a hostile judiciary and state-owned media. And so it sought to change the management of the state-owned media and “reform” (in its terms) the judiciary.

When it tried to change personnel in both institutions, the opposition charged that these actions violated the constitution, that the government had overstepped its bounds and that it was trying to repress critics. The government countered that the opposition was trying to thwart the new government from ruling. It had been elected by a substantial majority, and it had clearly expressed its policies during the elections.

Politics as usual

So far this is politics as usual. Examples of it abound. In the United States in the 20th century, President Franklin D Roosevelt, facing a Supreme Court of entrenched conservatives, tried to expand the court’s size and pack it with his own supporters. He lost. In Britain, in the decades after World War II, the state-owned BBC had a monopoly on broadcasting and had been staffed by Labour governments. Conservative governments accused it of being hostile to them, and attempts to change the staff were met with accusations of censorship.

These sorts of arguments are endemic to democracies with government bureaucracies. The public mood changes but the bureaucracies’ ideology remains intact. A battle ensues. Competing factions all point to dire consequences if their views don’t prevail, but a viable if not altogether acceptable solution is normally found.

What makes the Polish situation different is the threatened intervention by the European Union bureaucracy and the vocal hostility of Germany to the new government’s policies. This includes threats to suspend Poland from participation in some EU functions and various hostile claims about the Polish government.

This not only raises the stakes but also goes to the heart of liberal democracy. At the core of liberal democracy is the right of national self-determination. Self-determination, according to theorists of liberal democracy like Locke and Montesquieu, involves some sort of democratic process, a concept with a wide variety of institutional structures, all of which have, at their core, some sort of electoral process.

There is no question that Poland’s current government was elected in a legitimate vote, and in that sense, it represents the determination of the people. The implicit claim made by its opponents is that in implementing this mandate the government violated the Polish Constitution. I am reminded of Andrew Jackson’s response to a Supreme Court ruling with which he disagreed, when he suggested that the court should have to enforce its own ruling because his government wouldn’t. Jackson undoubtedly violated the essence of the US Constitution, but the republic survived.

Deviation

Given that Poland’s government emerged as an act of self-determination, and given that the actions it has undertaken are not unprecedented in the annals of liberal democracy, it is strange that the EU and Germany should be so aggressive in raising an alarm over Poland. There are a number of reasons. First, the EU has a core ideology. One part of it is a commitment to free trade. The other is a commitment to a social order that is primarily secular, that seeks to overcome national distinctions and that is intolerant of intolerance.

By this I mean that it embraces the doctrine that the state must not only permit variances in private life but be prepared to enshrine them in a legal system of compulsory tolerance. The combination of a commitment to free trade and a commitment to private choices being enshrined as part of public policy inevitably finds certain varieties of liberal democracy unacceptable. Nationalist exclusivity, erosion of secularism by religiosity and a reluctance to turn private freedom into something explicitly celebrated by the state are rejected.

The Polish government’s misfeasance is not really about courts or broadcasting. Rather, it is about Poland deviating from the EU’s ideology. The Polish government has opposed unlimited immigration into Poland by Muslims, arguing that it would change the country’s national character. In other words, Poland has elevated national distinctions to a level unacceptable to the European Union. It insists that there is a Polish nation and that others with differing values cannot become part of it.

There is the additional question of secularism. Poland is a Catholic country, not only in the sense that many practice that religion but in the deeper sense, that Polish history is bound up with Catholicism. This is true for all of Europe (adding in Orthodox and Protestantism), but for Poland this bond is far fresher. The destruction of communism in Poland, and to a great extent in Eastern Europe in general, was deeply dependent on the Polish Catholic Church, which encouraged and protected the resistance movement against communism and against the German occupation that preceded it.

When Catholicism was seen as an anti-totalitarian movement, the Europeans celebrated it. When it was discovered that the Catholic Church was not just a non-governmental organisation demanding human rights but was also truly Catholic — a religion — Europeans cooled to it. When the Catholic Church, always deeply embedded in Polish political life, pursued positions on private life unacceptable to the EU’s ideology and was entwined with the new government, the hostility jelled.

Benefits of membership

The Polish government represents a fundamental challenge to the EU. The EU promoted an ideology in which national distinctions were to subside and be replaced by a European ideology. Since 2008, resistance to the priority of Europeanism over national identity has increased. This is what motivated Brexit. Poland and some other Eastern European countries have been particularly unwilling to abandon their national identities. In Poland’s case, this national identity was tied to public religiosity — a religion unwilling to be confined to the private sphere and unwilling to accept the EU’s views on the state’s affirmation of a variety of behaviours.

The EU’s ideology became more problematic after 2008 as the economic benefits of membership declined. The EU has sought to protect its moral and social principles in the face of this decline. The Polish government directly challenges this ideology. If the idea of Europeanism weakens and the idea of the nation rises, while Europe fails to return to its pre-2008 prosperity, then the moral principles binding the EU will wither.

There is a reason Eastern Europe — Poland and Hungary, in particular — are championing this. Poland was sovereign for about 20 years during recent centuries. It lost its sovereignty to Germany and Russia. Losing it again to the EU, whose economic promise is in question and which demands the right to judge and guide Poland’s internal life, seems like a bad deal. Eastern Europe has struggled for its sovereignty for a long time. Sovereignty means not bending your knee to a greater power.

But for the EU, Poland and Hungary are mortal challenges. They have defined being European in a certain way. Poland and Hungary are reclaiming their right to their own national identity. The spread of the idea of national identity over EU values leaves the EU as an economic relationship, an elective affinity based on what the EU brings to the table. The EU is configured to judge its members. If the Polish (and British) disease spreads, the members will be judging the EU.

_______________

The views expressed in this opinion editorial are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Emerging Europe’s editorial policy.

The article was originally published on Geopolitical Futures. It has been reprinted with permission.

RELATED ARTICLES

Hungary and Israel: the Collision of Past and Present

Budapest synagoge

Examining How a Strong Swiss Franc Could Single-Handedly Topple Poland’s Economy

Macedonia’s Controversial Coalition Government

SKOPJE MACEDONIA emerging europe

Regional Relations in the Western Balkans: Moving Beyond Folklore

Bosnia and Herzegovina flag with Serbia flag, 3D rendering

History as Destiny? Institutional Erosion in Ukraine and Poland

Prepare for a New Europe

Is the CEE Region About to Steal the Outsourcing Crown From India?

Amazing view on the Taj Mahal in sunset light with reflection in water. The Taj Mahal is an ivory-white marble mausoleum on the south bank of the Yamuna river. Agra Uttar Pradesh India.

Not All Quiet on the Eastern Front

The Right to Water: Who Can Change Today’s Situation?

We, the Post-Communist Generation, Have the Skills to Rid of the Past And Create Our Own Future

Let’s Stop Wasting Time Redefining our Place in Europe

Europe at Odds over OPAL and Nord Stream 2

Business Moving Forward with Cautious Optimism — Can Investors Win the Confidence Game?

Polish Tax Laws — Fighting a Winning Battle Against Tax Evaders

A New Division Between Eastern And Western Europe?

Poland’s Confusing GDP Growth

Could the West At Least Help Ukraine To Insure FDI Against Political Risks?

Where’s My Cheese? – The GREAT British Food Tour 2014

Cheese Shop

Poland’s Capital Saturation Lower Than the Czech Republic’s

deloitte fdi poland

Global Expansion in the Digital Age

Will the New Five-day Visa-free Regime Encourage More Visitors to Belarus?

Changing Perspectives and Showing That True Romania is a Vibrant Innovative Country

How strong is V4?

Viktor Orban

Breaking With Imitations of the Past

EU Visa-Liberalisation Strengthens Georgia’s Pro-Western Path

georgia emerging europe eu

Will a Two-speed European Union Side-line the Visegrad Four?

PiS Uses Media Control to Bring Poland to Heel

Jaroslaw kaczynski pis emerging europe

When Neutrality Isn’t an Option

President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin

Under Promise, Over Deliver: Prospects for the EU’s Eastern Partnership in 2018

Eastern partnership

E-lifestyle and Cyber Security: Some Views From Estonia

Cyber Security Protection Firewall Interface Concept

EU-CEE Is Still Growing at a Healthy Rate

Prague emerging europe

Bulgaria Needs a Reform-Oriented Government to Take Full Advantage of its EU Membership

bulgaria emerging europe

Stuck in Neutral: Georgia’s Constitutional Reforms

Tbilisi Parliament Georgia

Can Armenia Keep a Foot in Both Camps?

European union armenia russia emerging europe

Moldova Falls Victim to Politicising

moldova emerging europe

Poland’s Drift Away From Democracy

Swimpassing Dniester Without Prejudice To Democracy

Parliament of the republic of moldova in chisinau, national flag, stefan cel mare street, spring time with blue sky

Azerbaijan: The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Nothing

Baku

Partnership is the Key to CEE-Indian Business

United or Divided? Europe in the Face of the Challenges of Tomorrow

The Global Outsourcing Industry — the Rise of the Phoenix

Czech Own Currency Insures Against Euro Losses

Euro Czech republic emerging europe

January Kicks Off an Exciting Year for Emerging Europe

The CEE Region Is Making Advances in Prioritising Waste-to-Energy Projects

After 25 Years of Restructuring, the Romanian Power Sector Is at a Crossroad

The EU’s Choice: Fundamental Reform Or Disintegration

Fiscal Policy Predictability in CEE — It’s Time for Change

Adam Smith’s Warning for Poland

CEE-Benefits and Disadvantages of Joining the Eurozone

forint zloty euro

2018 Elections — Vital Decisions for Hungary’s Future

Victor Orban energing europe

The GREAT London Food Scene

Bakery in London

The Long Tail of Global Expansion

Impact of Brexit on EU-CEE Not Overstated

theresa may brexit

Is there any prospect of ‘Polexit’?

poland european union polexit

LGBT in CEE — A New Acceptance Is Being Born From Migration

Serbia’s New PM Is Cut From a Familiar Cloth

Serbian flag emerging europe

Measuring Growth of Societies with GDP Alone Shows an Incomplete Picture

Central and Eastern European Consumers Are Joining the Global Trends for Change

Europe Needs To Be More Proactive In Embracing Armenia

Belarus 2020: Turning the Vicious Circle Into an Upward Spiral

After Its Significant Rise the Georgian Economy May Now Fall

Panorama of Tbilisi, Georgia in sunset rays. Vivid, saturated, splittoned image.

Ex-Transition Economies’ FDI Recovery

dollar euro fdi

The Competitive Edge in Central and Eastern Europe

SOFIA BULGARIA - MAY 5: View of the Ivan Vazov National Theatre in Sofia on May 5 2016. Sofia is the largest city and capital of Bulgaria.

The EU’s Benign Neglect Of Eastern Europe

Brexit: Let’s Learn the Lesson and Hope a Better Europe Will Arise

Emphasising the Incongruence Between the V4 Countries

Macron emerging europe

Albania’s Election Apathy

tirana albania

The Sharing Economy Could Bring New Business Models to CEE

The Voice of European Business Must Be Heard Loud and Clear by Brexit Negotiators

Resignation in Ukraine: War, Revolution, Crisis — Some Things Never Change

European Volatility Makes Economic Development Slower for Ukraine

Are Labour Shortages Driving Economic Growth?

How Will Poland Approach the Brexit Negotiations?

Poland: Is it Ready, and is it Time to Adopt the Euro?

Poland’s Unicorn, Slovakia’s Flying Car and the Future of Europe

China: A Giant That Is Hard to Crack

Old Fashioned Skulduggery Overshadows the Elections in Moldova

How Will Trump’s Visit Affect Polish Politics?

Donald trump

A Bosnian Referendum Shows Russia’s Influence in the Balkans—As Well As Its Limits

Why Hungary’s New NGO Law Is Harmful for Business

Budapest, Hungary. Aerial view of the old city Budapest, Hungary with river and Parliament Building with cloudy blue sky

The Morawiecki Plan Promises a Brighter Future for Poland

Outsourcing in Germany: Stop Talking at and Start Talking to

Defending EU Values in Poland and Hungary

Eu hungary poland

Falling into Old Ways in 2017? Ukraine’s Struggle for Functioning Economic Institutions

CEE — Do We Need a Launch Pad For Our On-Site Tech Intelligence in the Silicon Valley

Belarusian Journalists Still Face Huge Problems

Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Moves from Frozen to Kinetic

Nagorno-Karabakh

Hungary’s Nationalist Assault on Free Enquiry

victor orban ceu

Only a United Opposition Can Defeat Poland’s Ruling Law and Justice Party

Classical building of Polish parliament. Warsaw in Poland.

Will Poland Leave the European Union?

polexit

Poland Needs to Cling to the Eurozone

zloty euro emerging europe

The Netherlands’ Objection to the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement could be Costly to Europe

Ukraine’s Reputation for Cheap Labour May Not Ring True in the Long-term

Romania Surviving the Waves of Recent Political Tsunamis in Europe

Good Match But Unlikely Marriage

People Power Reminds the Government of the Rule of Law

Finalising the DCFTA is Expected to Bring Multiple Benefits to Ukraine

Political Tensions Rise As Croatia Allegedly Breaks the Dublin III Refugee Regulation

croatia migrants

Czech Republic Renaming Has Real Economic Costs

Big Fish, Small Fish, Where to Fish? On the Eve of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Are There Differences Between How Tax Regulations in Poland and IAS Treat Intangible Assets?

A Positive and Modern View of Entrepreneurship

The Capital Markets Union: a New Beginning in the European Financial Sector?

Slovenia’s Presidential Election: Pahor Expected to Romp Home

Slovenia flag against blue sky waving in wind

International Women’s Day — Let’s Take Action And Then Celebrate

  1. I always find it odd that the former colonizer nations fully understand why their colonies demanded their independence from a nation that didn’t share the same cultural history and societal values of the country they had “invaded”. Obviously it is rational for South Africa, India/Pakistan, Caribbean Island nations, et. al. to not appreciate the foreigners in their lands. But now it is absolutely beyond the pale for citizens of a Western nation to want the same thing – to retain their cultural heritage and national sovereignty by keeping out foreigners. European elites are still the colonizers, they just now see Southern and Eastern European nations as the dirty natives whose values need to be changed.

  2. Great article that actually attempts to dig beyond the usual garbage the other media outlets recycle over and over.

    I just wanted to say that the EU should wake up to the fact that forcing all member countries to become ethnically diverse has the opposite end result. absolutely no diversity. The beauty of Europe has always been the unique differences between all the countries and you also had some countries that did have high levels of diversity. Usually these were the countries that had in the past been colonialist and as a result ended up inheriting those foreign identities. Poland never had a history of colonialism so its unjust to push multiculturalism onto Poland.

    I also have a beef when western europe demeans Poland by calling it a young and immature democracy because they believe that democracy in Poland only started after the collapse of communism in 1989. The reality is Poland’s adoption of a Constitution on May 03 1791 is the first in Europe and second after the United States in the world. In fact Poland’s Monarchy was not a dynasty, the kings of Poland were actually voted into service starting all the way back in 1573. Poland’s first elected king was actually Frances Henry III who was not supposed to inherit the French crown, he was briefly Poland’s king until the unexpected death of his brother.

  3. There is some point to it, but.. No, Poland is not “too much nationalist” and not breaking the EU rules in any way. For example, there is a rule that anyone like a Spaniard or Estonian or Slovak may move to Poland (or vice versa) and freely work and live there. There is almost nobody against this rule in Poland, ie. not nationalist in this sense. But there is a point you did not mention enough but it is the core of the dispute. The EU states never agreed they will accept huge amounts of citizens from outside of Europe, especially from Muslim countries. This is what PL and HU are against, and this is what also Czechs, Slovaks and probably Austrians and others are against. Sooner or later, there will be a majority against this I believe. Was there ever a vote on this? No. This was the decision by German Chancellor Merkel alone, in breach of the Dublin III EU Treaty, in breach of her own constitution section 16A and against any common sense, taking everyone (not just war refugees and not temporarily as stated by their media). What Poles do not want: to be islamized and to lose their secure streets to the level of France or Belgium, Sweden etc. This is the real core of this dispute. It is not about wanting to “catholicise” everyone on Polish soil and not against the free movement of citizens between EU countries. Also, the ideology of the EU has moved away from free markets (it violates free markets in many points) to leftist progressivist ideology with multicultural characters (but in reality heading for non-European monoculture). But this is not something eternal, just a few elections and this ideology will be replaced to one more friendly to the Polish view. But Poles do not want to break the EU, it is the EU organs currently “run” by Germany and France that violate all sensible common policy. Their new ideology leads to disaster breakup unless changed, unfortunately. They do not have a majority even in Germany or France for this type of “replacement” but they do not dare to ask in a referendum.

  4. Mr. Friedman writes about sovereignty as rationally as a 4th grader. Since Europe remains an occupied subcontinent in the 21st century. And just last year, Poland itself welcomed foreign troops on its soil once again, what type of sovereignty does any country in Europe have?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *