Will a Two-speed European Union Side-line the Visegrad Four?

.

Aleksandra Polak

About Aleksandra Polak

Aleksandra Polak works at the Centre for Social and Economic Research (CASE) in Warsaw. She graduated from the College of Europe (MA in European Interdisciplinary Studies), the University of Sussex (MA in Global Political Economy) and the University of Warsaw (BA in Philosophy and BA in European Studies). She gained experience at the Polish Institute of the Foreign Affairs (PISM) in Warsaw, the Centre d’étude de la vie politique in Brussels, the Polish MFA (European Union Economic Department) and the Permanent Representation of Poland to the EU in Brussels. Her focus is EU governance, European social policies and economic inequality, socially inclusive and sustainable growth, EU macroeconomic coordination.

During the summit marking the 25th anniversary of the Maastricht Treaty, in December 2016, the president of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, called for a move forward with a two-speed Europe and also for the creation of a different orbit for those EU Member States who do not wish to take part in all facets of EU integration. If implemented, this approach will have far-reaching consequences for the CEE region, especially for the countries of the Visegrad group (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia), which could effectively be side-lined in a two-speed Europe.

Juncker is not the first European leader to support the concept that different Member States should be able to integrate at different paces, with ‘core’ countries being the avant-garde of European integration. This idea, first proposed by Wolfgang Schäuble in 1994, resurfaced during pre-Brexit negotiations and was endorsed by the six founding EU member states as well as key European players.

In the wake of the Eurozone crisis, there has been a growing consensus among the core European leaders that the Eurogroup’s informal status as a Eurozone government should be formalised into a closer political union. The most plausible scenario for such cooperation is the proposal from Paolo Gentiloni, the Italian Prime Minister, where a smaller circle of countries would share the single currency, the Schengen Treaty and, especially, a better coordination in defence.

Such intensified integration within the Eurozone core countries could include policies such as adopting common Eurobonds, collectivising debt, completing a banking union and integrating defence capabilities. The initiative gained further momentum after Donald Trump’s election victory in November, reflecting European fears about Trump’s uncertain foreign policy stance towards NATO and the European Union.

The EU’s determination to proceed with a two-track Europe, notwithstanding from the political will to advance economic and military integration in the Eurozone, could be also explained by core countries’ fatigue and disappointment with the “misbehaviour” of the newer member states. During the previous six months, the Central European countries, which used to be the “wonder kids” of the EU, have turned into a headache for the “old” community. In the first instance, the Visegrad group antagonised the rest of the EU with their reluctance to institute a migrant quota, in the wake of the refugee crisis.

Then secondly, illiberal political turns in Hungary and Poland caused concerns over judicial independence, provoking the European Commission to start a “rule-of-law” procedure in the case of Poland. If Poland does not implement the Commission’s recommendations, the procedure could end up stripping Poland of its voting rights in the EU Council.

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker

Thirdly, Polish and Hungarian leaders have been openly critical of the policies of the EU, calling for a cultural counter-revolution to reform the EU and blaming Brussels for Brexit, the migrant crisis, and for undermining historical national identities.

Creating two tiers of EU membership could be seen as a way of circumventing these troublesome CEE countries. In times of a ‘polycrisis’ — the sovereign debt crisis and recession, instability in the European neighbourhood, the rise of Euro-scepticism and Brexit, the unprecedented magnitude of migration flows — EU leaders may prefer to close ranks within the old core of Europe.

These moves are just another manifestation of the reality that, despite their prominence, the Visegrad countries have seen their power wane. Once influential players on the European arena, they are likely to become the black sheep of the EU. The group’s significance and its impact on the European decision-making process would considerably diminish in the two-speed European Union, making convergence with the core even less likely.

CEE countries are likely to become a second- or even a third-speed Europe, if the core countries decide to proceed with closer integration; a reality which Central European leaders should be conscious of.

_______________

The views expressed in this opinion editorial are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Emerging Europe’s editorial policy.

RELATED ARTICLES

Could the West At Least Help Ukraine To Insure FDI Against Political Risks?

Are There Differences Between How Tax Regulations in Poland and IAS Treat Intangible Assets?

Business Moving Forward with Cautious Optimism — Can Investors Win the Confidence Game?

Poland’s Unicorn, Slovakia’s Flying Car and the Future of Europe

Measuring Growth of Societies with GDP Alone Shows an Incomplete Picture

The EU’s Choice: Fundamental Reform Or Disintegration

Hungary’s Nationalist Assault on Free Enquiry

victor orban ceu

Are Labour Shortages Driving Economic Growth?

Poland: Is it Ready, and is it Time to Adopt the Euro?

Europe Needs To Be More Proactive In Embracing Armenia

International Women’s Day — Let’s Take Action And Then Celebrate

Polish Tax Laws — Fighting a Winning Battle Against Tax Evaders

Poland’s Confusing GDP Growth

After 25 Years of Restructuring, the Romanian Power Sector Is at a Crossroad

People Power Reminds the Government of the Rule of Law

The EU’s Benign Neglect Of Eastern Europe

Will the New Five-day Visa-free Regime Encourage More Visitors to Belarus?

A Positive and Modern View of Entrepreneurship

The Competitive Edge in Central and Eastern Europe

SOFIA BULGARIA - MAY 5: View of the Ivan Vazov National Theatre in Sofia on May 5 2016. Sofia is the largest city and capital of Bulgaria.

Finalising the DCFTA is Expected to Bring Multiple Benefits to Ukraine

The Morawiecki Plan Promises a Brighter Future for Poland

Outsourcing in Germany: Stop Talking at and Start Talking to

Macedonia’s Controversial Coalition Government

SKOPJE MACEDONIA emerging europe

We, the Post-Communist Generation, Have the Skills to Rid of the Past And Create Our Own Future

Brexit: Let’s Learn the Lesson and Hope a Better Europe Will Arise

Falling into Old Ways in 2017? Ukraine’s Struggle for Functioning Economic Institutions

Big Fish, Small Fish, Where to Fish? On the Eve of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

The Right to Water: Who Can Change Today’s Situation?

The CEE Region Is Making Advances in Prioritising Waste-to-Energy Projects

The Voice of European Business Must Be Heard Loud and Clear by Brexit Negotiators

United or Divided? Europe in the Face of the Challenges of Tomorrow

January Kicks Off an Exciting Year for Emerging Europe

Resignation in Ukraine: War, Revolution, Crisis — Some Things Never Change

Fiscal Policy Predictability in CEE — It’s Time for Change

CEE — Do We Need a Launch Pad For Our On-Site Tech Intelligence in the Silicon Valley

European Volatility Makes Economic Development Slower for Ukraine

Belarus 2020: Turning the Vicious Circle Into an Upward Spiral

Old Fashioned Skulduggery Overshadows the Elections in Moldova

The Long Tail of Global Expansion

The Global Outsourcing Industry — the Rise of the Phoenix

History as Destiny? Institutional Erosion in Ukraine and Poland

The Netherlands’ Objection to the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement could be Costly to Europe

The Sharing Economy Could Bring New Business Models to CEE

Global Expansion in the Digital Age

LGBT in CEE — A New Acceptance Is Being Born From Migration

A New Division Between Eastern And Western Europe?

How Will Poland Approach the Brexit Negotiations?

Ukraine’s Reputation for Cheap Labour May Not Ring True in the Long-term

Bulgaria Needs a Reform-Oriented Government to Take Full Advantage of its EU Membership

bulgaria emerging europe

Changing Perspectives and Showing That True Romania is a Vibrant Innovative Country

Not All Quiet on the Eastern Front

The Capital Markets Union: a New Beginning in the European Financial Sector?

Central and Eastern European Consumers Are Joining the Global Trends for Change

A Bosnian Referendum Shows Russia’s Influence in the Balkans—As Well As Its Limits

The GREAT London Food Scene

Bakery in London

Let’s Stop Wasting Time Redefining our Place in Europe

Breaking With Imitations of the Past

Europe at Odds over OPAL and Nord Stream 2

Czech Republic Renaming Has Real Economic Costs

Romania Surviving the Waves of Recent Political Tsunamis in Europe

Examining How a Strong Swiss Franc Could Single-Handedly Topple Poland’s Economy

Where’s My Cheese? – The GREAT British Food Tour 2014

Cheese Shop

Prepare for a New Europe

China: A Giant That Is Hard to Crack

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *